- SERATO VS TRAKTOR YAHOO ANSWERS DRIVERS
- SERATO VS TRAKTOR YAHOO ANSWERS UPDATE
- SERATO VS TRAKTOR YAHOO ANSWERS PATCH
- SERATO VS TRAKTOR YAHOO ANSWERS SOFTWARE
That’s a pretty big admission, whether in a “reasonable timeframe” before the partnership ended, or not. This would seem to confirm that Stanton did ask for Intel Mac compatibility, and NI said no. Native Instruments has completely fulfilled all development and support responsibilities towards Stanton Magnetics.”
SERATO VS TRAKTOR YAHOO ANSWERS SOFTWARE
“Stanton Magnetics never requested the development of a Mac Intel-compatible version of the FinalScratch software within a reasonable timeframe before the partnership of the two companies ended. Statement regarding Stanton Magnetics FinalScratch, February 23 įirst, NI effectively claims they were already in “divorce proceedings” by the time Stanton asked for an Intel Mac version: Let’s see how Native Instruments responds in a counter-announcement recently posted to their website:
The whole point is the ability to use the control vinyl. Here’s the only problem: it’s not ScratchAmp’s capability as an audio interface that makes it appealing to Final Scratch users. See The Official Word from Stanton – again, plus discussion, from our favorite turntablist site, Skratchworx We invite you to encourage your software company to make their developments ScratchAmp compatible!
SERATO VS TRAKTOR YAHOO ANSWERS UPDATE
The ScratchAmp is and always has been fully compatible with all Mac technology, but an Intel compatible update for FS2 users on the software side was never developed, and all of Stanton’s requests for this software update have been denied by the developer … We would also like to stress the fact that we are open to offering compatibility to ALL developers, including N.I., and any others who may choose to stand behind the ScratchAmp and implement our code in their programs, present and future.
SERATO VS TRAKTOR YAHOO ANSWERS PATCH
In a statement released this week and spread wide on the Web, Stanton said it was unable to patch NI’s software, because NI is responsible for software support and refused to create an update: Step two - here’s where things get ugly: blame Native Instruments for the compatibility problems. Given that there are other DJ audio interfaces on the market, it’d be more fair to call this “Final Scratch Unbundled.” The ScratchAmp could be a great audio interface, but you’ll still need a DJ app and control vinyl to complete the solution. Not exactly news, of course, and the only reason Stanton has to push hard to communicate this message is that they had previously focused on marketing an integrated solution, rather than an open, BYO software solution.
SERATO VS TRAKTOR YAHOO ANSWERS DRIVERS
What’s “open” about it? Well, it’s an audio interface, with ASIO (PC) and Core Audio drivers (Mac) that let you use it with any software you want - just like any other audio interface. Step one for Stanton: rename their existing hardware audio interface Final Scratch Open. Meanwhile, with NI dropping support for the software end of Final Scratch, Stanton is in the unenviable position of trying to keep their user base from leaving altogether. And that combined with other compatibility issues could mean the big losers here are Final Scratch customers, who are likely to be really unhappy when they learn the “solution” means buying new products, whether from NI, Stanton, or a third party. Here’s where the first bad news hits: the existing Final Scratch software is incompatible with Intel Macs. As with any breakup, that raised questions about support. For those of you who missed the fireworks, Native Instruments recently left its partner Stanton Magnetics (makers of Final Scratch) to pursue its own DJ strategy, which it unveiled at NAMM as (coincidentally named, I’m sure) Traktor Scratch.